From 24308e67c797f6d2aa72f2a7ea982926549f7479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:49:27 +0200 Subject: faq: Remove suboptimal "territory" analogy. * drafts/faq.md: Remove the analogy with "territory" and "central government". --- drafts/faq.md | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drafts/faq.md b/drafts/faq.md index 2c027fc..92e03d8 100644 --- a/drafts/faq.md +++ b/drafts/faq.md @@ -60,9 +60,7 @@ active](https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/02/09/state-of-the-gnunion-2020), [ago](https://discourse.gnome.org/t/relation-between-gimp-and-gnome/2376/8) for all practical purposes despite being [still listed](https://www.gnu.org/software)—these projects have their own -governance model and rules, independent of “the rest of GNU”. To put it -differently, significant parts of GNU territory is no longer controlled -by the central government, if we dare such an analogy. +governance model and rules, independent of “the rest of GNU”. Anyway, is being a minority a problem? We don’t think so: we hope this platform appeals to many GNU contributors and contributors-to-be, but we -- cgit v1.2.1