1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
index 4072005..80deb0c 100644
--- a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
+++ b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording
 > sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal
 > characteristics.
 
+Related comment:
+
+> "welcomes contributions" could be read as "accepts all
+> contributions".  Might be fixed by moving the important part first
+> so it would read: "The GNU Project commits to providing a
+> harassment-free experience for all contributors. It wants to
+> give..."
+
 # External threats
 
 > A native speaker sent this to me:
@@ -104,4 +112,23 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording
 >   for contribution are left entirely up to the individual.
 > 
 
+# Implications regarding non-GNU activity
+
+> Does adhering to this "social contract" mean that as a GNU developer
+> I should not work at <state sponsored spying agency>, <proprietary
+> company> or <privacy violating entity>.
+
+# A wording suggestion
+
+> "pays attention and responds to" should be "pays attention to and
+> responds to" or "pays attention to, and responds to," or "monitors
+> and responds to".
+
+# A general meta-question regarding why the document is needed
+
+> The tone and content of the draft contract are not changed from
+> existing practice. But give a better explanation of why a
+> restatement of the GNU project's goals and standards is needed, and
+> where it differs from the goals/standards in previous years.
+
 </markdown>